Virological safety of the UK blood supply in the era of individual risk assessments and HIV PrEP.

A more individualised donor selection policy was implemented in the UK in 2021, which replaced the previous 3-month deferral for men who have sex with men (MSM). Other blood services have a variety of policies in place to ensure the virological safety of blood components, ranging from an indefinite ban on MSM, to a defined period of exclusion, or to an individualised risk assessment that is not based on gender or sexual orientation. Justification of these policies should be based on scientific evidence including assessment of lengths of virological window periods, infectious disease epidemiology within donor populations and donation screening assay sensitivities. Developments in molecular technology and assays which can detect both antibodies and antigens in the very early stages of infection have significantly reduced the risk in most developed countries. However, the increasing usage of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent acquisition of HIV infection after possible high-risk sexual contact within the UK blood donor population has been recently noted. It has brought with it new diagnostic challenges within blood screening, notably possible non-detection of HIV RNA and serological markers following PrEP use despite potential infectivity. The use of other testing strategies such as detection of HIV DNA and screening for non-declared PrEP usage should be investigated further.

Guía para la gestión de riesgos de los dispositivos médicos para el diagnóstico / Risk management guidance for diagnostic medical devices

Introducción: Los fabricantes de los dispositivos médicos no siempre disponen de experiencia para realizar un proceso de gestión de riesgos que cumpla con la norma ISO 14971:2019 e incluya los requisitos metrológicos necesarios; por tanto, para un mejor uso de estos equipos, especialmente los de diagnóstico, se debe implementar y mantener un proceso de gestión de riesgos basado en las normativas establecidas. Objetivo: Proponer una guía para la gestión de los riesgos indirectos en pacientes con diagnósticos incorrectos o retrasados. Métodos: Se revisaron las normas internacionales aplicables y se analizaron expedientes de gestión del riesgo de dispositivos médicos, entre ellos reactivos para el diagnóstico in vitro. Resultados: La guía ofrece elementos orientadores para cada etapa del proceso de gestión de riesgos en los dispositivos médicos para el diagnóstico: plan de gestión del riesgo, análisis, valoración y control del riesgo, evaluación del riesgo residual global, revisión de la gestión de riesgo y retroalimentación a partir de la información de producción o posproducción. Conclusiones: Esta guía es una herramienta útil para diseñadores, fabricantes, evaluadores de dispositivos médicos para el diagnóstico, asesores en temas de gestión de riesgos y la calidad de los dispositivos y personal médico(AU)

Introduction: Manufacturers of medical devices do not always have the expertise to perform a risk management process that complies with ISO 14971:2019 and includes the necessary metrological requirements; therefore, for better use of these devices, especially diagnostic devices, a risk management process based on established regulations should be implemented and maintained. Objective: To provide guidance for the management of indirect risks in patients with incorrect or delayed diagnoses. Methods: Applicable international standards were reviewed and risk management dossiers for medical devices, including in-vitro diagnostic reagents, were analyzed. Results: The guidance provides guiding elements for each step of the risk management process for diagnostic medical devices: risk management plan, risk analysis, risk assessment, risk evaluation and control, overall residual risk assessment, risk management review, and feedback from production or post-production information. Conclusions: This guide is a useful tool for designers, manufacturers, evaluators of diagnostic medical devices, risk management and device quality assessors, and medical personnel(AU)

Impact of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist Relative to Its Design and Intended Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify what parts of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC) are working, what can be done to make it more effective, and to determine if it achieved its intended effect relative to its design and intended use. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a qualitative thematic analysis and meta-meta-analyses of findings in WHO SSC systematic reviews following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: Twenty systematic reviews were included for qualitative thematic analysis. Narrative information was coded in 4 primary areas with a focus on impact of the WHO SSC. Four themes-Clinical Outcomes, Process Measures, Team Dynamics and Communication, and Safety Culture-pertained directly to the aims or purposes behind the development of the SSC. The other 2 themes-Efficiency and Workload involved in using the checklist and Checklist Impact on Institutional Practices-are associated with SSC use, but were not focal areas considered during its development. Included in the 20 systematic reviews were 24 unique observational cohort studies that reported pre-post data on a total of 18 clinical outcomes. Mortality, morbidity, surgical site infection, pneumonia, unplanned return to the operating room, urinary tract infection, blood loss requiring transfusion, unplanned intubation, and sepsis favored the use of the WHO SSC. Deep vein thrombosis was the only postoperative outcome assessed that did not favor use of the WHO SSC. CONCLUSIONS: The WHO SSC positively impacts the things it was explicitly designed to address and does not positively impact things it was not explicitly designed for.

Risk assessment for postoperative outcomes in a mixed hospitalized gynecological population by the Dutch safety management system (Veiligheidsmanagementsysteem, VMS) screening tool 'frail elderly'.

PURPOSE: Frailty is associated with a higher risk for negative postoperative outcomes. This study aimed to determine the association between the screening tool of the Dutch safety management system, Veiligheidsmanagementsysteem (VMS) 'frail elderly' and postoperative complications in a gynecological population. METHODS: This cohort study included women aged 70 years or older, who were scheduled for any kind of gynecological surgery. VMS screening data (including risk for delirium, falling, malnutrition, and functional impairment) were extracted from the electronic patient records. VMS score could range between 0 and 4 patients with a VMS score of one or more were considered frail. Data on possible confounding factors and complications within 30 days after surgery, classified with the Clavien-Dindo classification, were collected. Regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: 157 women were included with a median age of 74 years (inter quartile range 71-79). Most patients underwent prolapse surgery (52%) or hysterectomy (31%). Forty-one patients (26%) experienced any postoperative complication. Sixty-two patients (39%) were considered frail preoperatively by the VMS screening tool. Frailty measured with the VMS screening tool was not independently associated with postoperative complications in multivariable analysis (Odds ratio 1.18; 95% CI 0.49-2.82). However, a recent fall in the last 6 months (n = 208) was associated with postoperative complications (Odds ratio 3.90; 95% CI 1.57-9.66). CONCLUSION: An independent association between frailty, determined by the VMS screening tool 'Frail elderly', and postoperative complications in gynecological surgery patients could not be confirmed. A recent fall in the last 6 months seems associated with postoperative complications.

Development and content validation of the Safe Surgery Organizational Readiness Tool: A quality improvement study.

BACKGROUND: Recent efforts to increase access to safe and high-quality surgical care in low- and middle-income countries have proven successful. However, multiple facilities implementing the same safety and quality improvement interventions may not all achieve successful outcomes. This heterogeneity could be explained, in part, by pre-intervention organizational characteristics and lack of readiness of surgical facilities. In this study, we describe the process of developing and content validating the Safe Surgery Organizational Readiness Tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The new tool was developed in two stages. First, qualitative results from a Safe Surgery 2020 intervention were combined with findings from a literature review of organizational readiness and change. Second, through iterative discussions and expert review, the Safe Surgery Organizational Readiness Tool was content validated. RESULTS: The Safe Surgery Organizational Readiness Tool includes 14 domains and 56 items measuring the readiness of surgical facilities in low- and middle-income countries to implement surgical safety and quality improvement interventions. This multi-dimensional and multi-level tool offers insights into facility members' beliefs and attitudes at the individual, team, and facility levels. A panel review affirmed the content validity of the Safe Surgery Organizational Readiness Tool. CONCLUSION: The Safe Surgery Organizational Readiness Tool is a theory- and evidence-based tool that can be used by change agents and facility leaders in low- and middle-income countries to assess the baseline readiness of surgical facilities to implement surgical safety and quality improvement interventions. Next steps include assessing the reliability and validity of the Safe Surgery Organizational Readiness Tool, likely resulting in refinements.

Current understanding and future directions for an occupational infectious disease standard.

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has demonstrated a need for an infectious disease standard that will promote a safe and healthy work environment and assure business continuity. The current pandemic has revealed gaps in workplace preparedness and employee protections to microbial exposures. Federal and state government agencies have responded by providing interim guidelines and stop-gap measures that continue to evolve and vary in approach and required controls. This interim and inconsistent approach has resulted in confusion on the part of businesses as they work toward reopening during the pandemic and uncertainty as to the efficacy of required or suggested controls. Moving forward, the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration, with guidance from the US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, should establish consistent and effective strategies through a nationwide standard to address the potential microbial exposures in the workplace. Such a standard will require effective worker protections from infectious diseases and assure business continuity.

Adesão às medidas de biossegurança da enfermagem na unidade de terapia intensiva: revisão sistemática / Adherence to nursing biosafety measures in the intensive care unit: systematic review / Adhesión a las medidas de bioseguridad de enfermería en la unidad de cuidados intensivos: revisión sistemática

Objetivo: Evidenciar os fatores determinantes para adesão das medidas de biossegurança pela equipe de Enfermagem na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva. Método: Estudo de revisão sistemática, que usou o instrumento Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A busca foi realizada a partir de artigos publicados no período de 2004 a 2019, por dificuldade de encontrar publicações em menor período acerca da temática deste estudo. Resultados: O conhecimento e as ações de promoção e prevenção, como a lavagem de mãos e o uso de Equipamento de Proteção Individual, além de recursos físicos, são fatores determinantes para adesão às medidas de biossegurança na UTI. Conclusão: As medidas de biossegurança garantem a segurança do paciente, e, por isso, é importante que os profissionais sejam capacitados regularmente para prevenir dificuldades e falhas de adesão com as medidas de biossegurança o que pode colocar em risco o paciente e o profissional da enfermagem.(AU)

Objective: To highlight the determining factors for adherence to biosafety measures by the Nursing team in the Intensive Care Unit. Method: Systematic review study, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) instrument. The search was carried out from articles published from 2004 to 2019, due to the difficulty of finding publications in a shorter period on the theme of this study. Results: Knowledge and promotion and prevention actions, such as hand washing and the use of Personal Protective Equipment, in addition to physical resources, are determining factors for adherence to biosafety measures in the ICU. Conclusion: Biosafety measures guarantee patient safety, and, therefore, it is important that professionals are trained regularly to prevent difficulties and failures in adherence to biosafety measures, which can put the patient and the nursing professional at risk. (AU)

Objetivo: Resaltar los determinantes de la adherencia a las medidas de bioseguridad por parte del equipo de Enfermería de la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. Método: Estudio de revisión sistemática, utilizando el instrumento Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). La búsqueda se realizó a partir de artículos publicados de 2004 a 2019, debido a la dificultad de encontrar publicaciones en un período más corto sobre la temática de este estudio. Resultados: El conocimiento y las acciones de promoción y prevención, como el lavado de manos y el uso de Equipos de Protección Personal, además de los recursos físicos, son factores determinantes para el cumplimiento de las medidas de bioseguridad en la UCI. Conclusión: Las medidas de bioseguridad garantizan la seguridad del paciente, por lo que es importante que los profesionales se capaciten periódicamente para prevenir dificultades y fallas en la adherencia a las medidas de bioseguridad, que pueden poner en riesgo al paciente y al profesional de enfermería.(AU)

Association Between Implementing Comprehensive Learning Collaborative Strategies in a Statewide Collaborative and Changes in Hospital Safety Culture.

Importance: Hospital safety culture remains a critical consideration when seeking to reduce medical errors and improve quality of care. Little is known regarding whether participation in a comprehensive, multicomponent, statewide quality collaborative is associated with changes in hospital safety culture. Objective: To examine whether implementation of a comprehensive, multicomponent, statewide surgical quality improvement collaborative is associated with changes in hospital safety culture. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this survey study, the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, a 56-item validated survey covering 6 culture domains (teamwork, safety, operating room safety, working conditions, perceptions of management, and employee engagement), was administered to a random sample of physicians, nurses, operating room staff, administrators, and leaders across Illinois hospitals to assess hospital safety culture prior to launching a new statewide quality collaborative in 2015 and then again in 2017. The final analysis included 1024 respondents from 36 diverse hospitals, including major academic, community, and rural centers, enrolled in ISQIC (Illinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative). Exposures: Participation in a comprehensive, multicomponent statewide surgical quality improvement collaborative. Key components included enrollment in a common standardized data registry, formal quality and process improvement training, participation in collaborative-wide quality improvement projects, funding support for local projects, and guidance provided by surgeon mentors and process improvement coaches. Main Outcomes and Measures: Perception of hospital safety culture. Results: The overall survey response rate was 43.0% (580 of 1350 surveys) in 2015 and 39.0% (444 of 1138 surveys) in 2017 from 36 hospitals. Improvement occurred in all the overall domains, with significant improvement in teamwork climate (change, 3.9%; P = .03) and safety climate (change, 3.2%; P = .02). The largest improvements occurred in individual measures within domains, including physician-nurse collaboration (change, 7.2%; P = .004), reporting of concerns (change, 4.7%; P = .009), and reduction in communication breakdowns (change, 8.4%; P = .005). Hospitals with the lowest baseline safety culture experienced the largest improvements following collaborative implementation (change range, 11.1%-14.9% per domain; P < .05 for all). Although several hospitals experienced improvement in safety culture in 1 domain, most hospitals experienced improvement across several domains. Conclusions and Relevance: This survey study found that hospital enrollment in a statewide quality improvement collaborative was associated with overall improvement in safety culture after implementing multiple learning collaborative strategies. Hospitals with the poorest baseline culture reported the greatest improvement following implementation of the collaborative.

Clarifying radiology's role in safety events: a 5-year retrospective common cause analysis of safety events at a pediatric hospital.

BACKGROUND: Common cause analysis of hospital safety events that involve radiology can identify opportunities to improve quality of care and patient safety. OBJECTIVE: To study the most frequent system failures as well as key activities and processes identified in safety events in an academic children's hospital that underwent root cause analysis and in which radiology was determined to play a contributing role. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All safety events involving diagnostic or interventional radiology from April 2013 to November 2018, for which the hospital patient safety department conducted root cause analysis, were retrospectively analyzed. Pareto charts were constructed to identify the most frequent modalities, system failure modes, key processes and key activities. RESULTS: In 19 safety events, 64 sequential interactions were attributed to the radiology department by the patient safety department. Five of these safety events were secondary to diagnostic errors. Interventional radiology, radiography and diagnostic fluoroscopy accounted for 89.5% of the modalities in these safety events. Culture and process accounted for 55% of the system failure modes. The three most common key processes involved in these sequential interactions were diagnostic (39.1%) and procedural services (25%), followed by coordinating care and services (18.8%). The two most common key activities were interpreting/analyzing (21.9%) and coordinating activities (15.6%). CONCLUSION: Proposing and implementing solutions based on the analysis of a single safety event may not be a robust strategy for process improvement. Common cause analyses of safety events allow for a more robust understanding of system failures and have the potential to generate more specific process improvement strategies to prevent the reoccurrence of similar errors. Our analysis demonstrated that the most common system failure modes in safety events attributed to radiology were culture and process. However, the generalizability of these findings is limited given our small sample size. Aligning with other children's hospitals to use standard safety event terminology and shared databases will likely lead to greater clarity on radiology's direct and indirect contributions to patient harm.

Guía para el tamizaje de colaboradores al ingresar a las instalaciones de trabajo y manejo de posibles casos sospechosos / Guide for the screening of collaborators when entering the work facilities and handling of possible suspicious cases

Básicamente contiene, en detalle, las condiciones, implementos y protocolos que deberán seguirse en los distintos lugares de trabajo, para el ingreso seguro de los trabajadores, así como la identificación de casos sospechosos y el seguimiento protocolario que deberán de dársele.

Views and experiences of decision-makers on organisational safety culture and medication errors.

BACKGROUND: In 2017, the World Health Organization published "Medication Without Harm, WHO Global Patient Safety Challenge," to reduce patient harm caused by unsafe medication use practices. While the five objectives emphasise the need to create a framework for action, engaging key stakeholders and others, most published research has focused on the perspectives of health professionals. The aim was to explore the views and experiences of decision-makers in Qatar on organisational safety culture, medication errors and error reporting. METHOD: Qualitative, semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare decision-makers (policy-makers, professional leaders and managers, lead educators and trainers) in Qatar. Participants were recruited via purposive and snowball sampling, continued to the point of data saturation. The interview schedule focused on: error causation and error prevention; engendering a safety culture; and initiatives to encourage error reporting. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and independently analysed by two researchers using the Framework Approach. RESULTS: From the 21 interviews conducted, key themes were the need to: promote trust within the organisation through articulating a fair blame culture; eliminate management, professional and cultural hierarchies; focus on team building, open communication and feedback; promote professional development; and scale-up successful initiatives. There was recognition that the current medication error reporting processes and systems were suboptimal, with suggested enhancements in themes of promoting a fair blame culture and open communication. CONCLUSION: These positive and negative aspects of organisational culture can inform the development of theory-based interventions to promote patient safety. Central to these will be the further development and sustainment of a "fair" blame culture in Qatar and beyond.

Adverse Events and Burnout: The Moderating Effects of Workgroup Identification and Safety Climate.

BACKGROUND: Prior research has found that adverse events have significant negative consequences for the patients (first victim) and caregivers (second victim) involved such as burnout. However, research has yet to examine the consequences of adverse events on members of caregiving units. We also lack research on the effects of the personal and job resources that shape the context of how adverse events are experienced. OBJECTIVES: We test the relationship between job demands (the number of adverse events on a hospital nursing unit) and nurses' experience of burnout. We further explore the ways in which personal (workgroup identification) and job (safety climate) resources amplify or dampen this relationship. Specifically, we examine whether, and the conditions under which, adverse events affect nurse burnout. RESEARCH DESIGN: Cross-sectional analyses of survey data on nurse burnout linked to hospital incident reporting system data on adverse event rates for the year before survey administration and survey data on workgroup identification and safety climate. SUBJECTS: Six hundred three registered nurses from 30 nursing units in a large, urban hospital in the Midwest completed questionnaires. RESULTS: Multilevel regression analysis indicated that adverse events were positively associated with nurse burnout. The effects of adverse events on nurse burnout were amplified when nurses exhibited high levels of workgroup identification and attenuated when safety climate perceptions were higher. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events have broader negative consequences than previously thought, widely affecting nurse burnout on caregiving units, especially when nurses strongly identify with their workgroup. These effects are mitigated when leaders cultivate safety climate.

USP General Chapter <800>: Considerations for Oncology Nursing Practice.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the nurse leader's role in implementing the hazardous drug safe-handling standards from USP General Chapter <800> that are most relevant to oncology nursing practice, and to provide strategies for reducing nurses' exposure to hazardous drugs. DATA SOURCES: Published literature indexed in PubMed, CINAHL, textbooks, and clinical expertise. CONCLUSION: Nurse leaders are essential to promoting a safe environment for nurses handling hazardous cancer drugs. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Several barriers and challenges to handling hazardous drugs exist and must be overcome before oncology nurses' exposure can be reduced.

COVID-19 Pandemic: What Every Otolaryngologist-Head and Neck Surgeon Needs to Know for Safe Airway Management.

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has unfolded with remarkable speed, posing unprecedented challenges for health care systems and society. Otolaryngologists have a special role in responding to this crisis by virtue of expertise in airway management. Against the backdrop of nations struggling to contain the virus's spread and to manage hospital strain, otolaryngologists must partner with anesthesiologists and front-line health care teams to provide expert services in high-risk situations while reducing transmission. Airway management and airway endoscopy, whether awake or sedated, expose operators to infectious aerosols, posing risks to staff. This commentary provides background on the outbreak, highlights critical considerations around mitigating infectious aerosol contact, and outlines best practices for airway-related clinical decision making during the COVID-19 pandemic. What otolaryngologists need to know and what actions are required are considered alongside the implications of increasing demand for tracheostomy. Approaches to managing the airway are presented, emphasizing safety of patients and the health care team.

Apparent Cause Analysis: A Safety Tool.

Causal analysis is a core function of safety programs. Although established protocols exist for conducting root cause analysis for serious safety events, there is limited guidance for apparent cause analysis (ACA) in health care. At our institution, through a novel facilitated ACA approach, we aim to improve safety culture and provide a clear approach to address precursor safety events and near-miss safety events. We define facilitated ACA as limited investigation (scope and duration) of a safety event that resulted in little to no harm. These investigations require fewer resources and focus on preventive strategies. Our facilitated ACA model, with an operational algorithm and structured process, was developed and implemented at our tertiary-care, freestanding, urban pediatric hospital in 2018. Sixty-four ACAs were completed, and 83% were identified with the algorithm. Process measures, including time from event reporting to ACA launch (median 3 days; interquartile range 2-6 days), are tracked. Patient safety consultants averaged 5 hours to complete a facilitated ACA. A median of 3 disciplines or departments participated in each facilitated ACA. Through an iterative process, we implemented a structured process for facilitated ACA, and the model's strength includes (1) right event, (2) right team, (3) right analysis, and (4) right action plans. This novel facilitated ACA model may support organizational cause analysis and improve safety culture with higher-reliability processes.

Nota informativa nº 05 /2020-GST/DVAST/SVS/SES: recomendações aos gestores e profissionais da segurança pública para enfrentamento da pandemia de Coronavírus ­ COVID-19 (infecção pelo SARS-CoV-2) / Informative note nº 05/2020-GST / DVAST / SVS / SES: recommendations to managers and public security professionals to cope with the Coronavirus pandemic - COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 infection)

Recomendações aos gestores e trabalhadores da Segurança pública (policiais federais, rodoviários, militares, civis, municipais, bombeiros, agentes penitenciários e socioeducativos) para discussão coletiva sobre medidas que amenizem os riscos à saúde dos trabalhadores e pessoas privadas de liberdade, como também, reduzam a disseminação do COVID-19 para seus familiares e a população em geral.

Recommendations to the managers and workers of public security (police federais, rodoviários, military, civis, municipais, bombeiros, penitentiary and socio-educational agents) for collective discussion on measures that mitigate the risks to the health of two workers and people deprived of freedom, as also, also, a dissemination of COVID-19 for family members and general population.

Recomendaciones a los gerentes y trabajadores de seguridad pública (federal, vial, militar, civil, municipal, bomberos, agentes penitenciarios y socioeducativos) para la discusión colectiva sobre medidas para mitigar los riesgos para la salud de los trabajadores y personas privadas de libertad, así como reducir la difusión del COVID-19 a sus familias y población en general.

The challenge of safe anesthesia in developing countries: defining the problems in a medical center in Cambodia.

BACKGROUND: The International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia (ISSPA) were developed on behalf of the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists and the World Health Organization. It has been recommend as an assessment tool that allows anesthetic providers in developing countries to assess their compliance and needs. This study was performed to describe the anesthesia service in one main public hospital during an 8-month medical mission in Cambodia and evaluate its anesthetic safety issues according to the ISSPA. METHODS: We conduct a retrospective study involving 1953 patients at the Preah Ket Mealea hospital. Patient demographics, anesthetic techniques, and complications were reviewed according to the registers of the anesthetic services and questionnaires. The inadequacies in personnel, facilities, equipment, medications, and conduct of anesthesia drugs were recorded using a checklist based on the ISSPA. RESULTS: A total of 1792 patients received general and regional anesthesia in the operating room, while 161 patients receiving sedation for gastroscopy. The patients' mean age was 45.0 ± 16.6 years (range, 17-87 years). The three most common surgical procedures were abdominal (52.0%; confidence interval [CI], 49.3-54.7), orthopedic (27.6%; CI, 25.2-29.9), and urological surgery (14.7%; CI, 12.8-16.6). General anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, and brachial plexus block were performed in 54.3% (CI, 51.7-56.8), 28.2% (CI, 25.9-30.5), and 9.4% (CI, 7.9-10.9) of patients, respectively. One death occurred. Twenty-six items related to professional aspects, monitoring, and conduct of anesthesia did not meet the ISSPA-recommended standards. A lack of commonly used drugs and monitoring equipment was noted, posing major threats to the safety of anesthesia practice, especially in emergency situations. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the scarce literature on anesthesia practice in low- and middle-income countries such as Cambodia. Future medical assistance should help to strengthen these countries' inadequacies, allowing for the adoption of international standards for the safe practice of anesthesia.